Days of War Nights of Love: Crimethink For Beginners
A mixed bag of anarchist essays professing to teach the reader to think for him/her self. Very little new material contained herein made me wonder where I had already learned this stuff. Kurt Vonnegut, Earnest Callenbach and Howard Zinn came to mind. The writers of this interesting Adbuster/Zine like presentation understand the sociopolitical constructs that keep people from thinking for themselves, but I'm not sure the belligerent, disembodied tone of the articles actually allow readers to think for themselves either. The provocative creation of the word CrimethInc! implies revolutionary thinking, but it's really the same territory that artists, queers and outsiders have understood all along. Shoplifting is as much crime as it gets.
Still the analysis of capitalism and the bourgeoisie (better explained as what keeps people inside a middle class perspective) may be useful. The use of words like "bourgeoisie" brings to mind the Marxists rantings of young feminists I met at UC Santa Cruz and that just about captures the tone of this book - young, arrogant, privileged and lost. The only underlying raison d'etre I could find was the pursuit of happiness and encouragement to define that in your own terms. This anarchy thing, then, is just another face of the culture of hyper individualism that has eaten the West inside out by replacing meaning and purpose with individual happiness.
The section on work is telling. I was inclined to re-label the whole anarchist philosophy "looser think" based on how the rubber meets the road here. If the same desire not to work for "the man" were reframed in the hyper positive "do what you love and the money will come" language of entrepreneurs who want to "be their own boss", the freedom that these anarchists seek would cover the same territory only not nearly as successfully or as happily. And while entrepreneurs profess to help people and society in general, our anarchists, here, talk only of supporting each other. Bringing down the system is optional and only if you feel up to it.
I did enjoy the little historical stories of subversive acts tucked throughout the book like a scavenger hunt. The section on hypocrisy was genuinely helpful in addressing the tendency of activists to want to be pure in integrating our beliefs and actions. Also the bit about identity being the scarcity economics of self was a good critique of our tendency to be attached to political ideologies. A little gem in Jeanette Winterson's essay titled "Product is the Excrement of Action" hit close to home in her example of making art from experience.
Still the analysis of capitalism and the bourgeoisie (better explained as what keeps people inside a middle class perspective) may be useful. The use of words like "bourgeoisie" brings to mind the Marxists rantings of young feminists I met at UC Santa Cruz and that just about captures the tone of this book - young, arrogant, privileged and lost. The only underlying raison d'etre I could find was the pursuit of happiness and encouragement to define that in your own terms. This anarchy thing, then, is just another face of the culture of hyper individualism that has eaten the West inside out by replacing meaning and purpose with individual happiness.
The section on work is telling. I was inclined to re-label the whole anarchist philosophy "looser think" based on how the rubber meets the road here. If the same desire not to work for "the man" were reframed in the hyper positive "do what you love and the money will come" language of entrepreneurs who want to "be their own boss", the freedom that these anarchists seek would cover the same territory only not nearly as successfully or as happily. And while entrepreneurs profess to help people and society in general, our anarchists, here, talk only of supporting each other. Bringing down the system is optional and only if you feel up to it.
I did enjoy the little historical stories of subversive acts tucked throughout the book like a scavenger hunt. The section on hypocrisy was genuinely helpful in addressing the tendency of activists to want to be pure in integrating our beliefs and actions. Also the bit about identity being the scarcity economics of self was a good critique of our tendency to be attached to political ideologies. A little gem in Jeanette Winterson's essay titled "Product is the Excrement of Action" hit close to home in her example of making art from experience.